المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية
آخر المواضيع المضافة
فاعلية التسويق الإلكتروني E-Marketing Effectiveness 2 فاعلية التسويق الإلكتروني E-Marketing Effectiveness 1 مفهوم التسويق الإلكتروني ومـراحل دورة التسويـق الإلكترونـي مـحـددات التـجـارة الإلكـتـرونـيـة 2 مـحددات التـجـارة الإلكـتـرونـيـة 1 مـشكلات التـجـارة الإلكتـرونـيـة التهديـدات الأمنيـة فـي بيئـة التـجارة الإلكترونـيـة ما ورد في شأن الرسول الأعظم والنبيّ الأكرم سيّدنا ونبيّنا محمّد (صلى الله عليه وآله) / القسم السابع ما ورد في شأن الرسول الأعظم والنبيّ الأكرم سيّدنا ونبيّنا محمّد (صلى الله عليه وآله) / القسم السادس ما ورد في شأن الرسول الأعظم والنبيّ الأكرم سيّدنا ونبيّنا محمّد (صلى الله عليه وآله) / القسم الخامس ما ورد في شأن الرسول الأعظم والنبيّ الأكرم سيّدنا ونبيّنا محمّد (صلى الله عليه وآله) / القسم الرابع التحنيط في عهد الأسرة الثانية والعشرين التحنيط في عهد الأسرة الواحدة والعشرين الحضارة المصرية في العهد اللوبي مثال تطبيقي لنموذج استمارة تحليل المضمون

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6238 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

مصادر الاصابة بالحشرات في مخازن التبغ (حشرات التبغ)
31-1-2016
في ما يعمل لوجع العين‏
10-05-2015
الشيخ مهدي ابن الشيخ محمد حسين الخالصي
12-2-2018
Diphthongs CURE
2024-07-02
الساسانيون
17-10-2016
احتجاج على أبو ذر على البيعة
10-4-2016

THE HORIZONTAL RELATIONSHIP  
  
348   02:37 صباحاً   date: 2024-09-04
Author : BARBARA MINTO
Book or Source : THE MINTO PYRAMID PRINCIPLE
Page and Part : 17-2


Read More
Date: 2024-09-15 238
Date: 2024-10-04 298
Date: 2024-09-30 256

THE HORIZONTAL RELATIONSHIP

In deciding what to say on the line below, not only must the points you include answer the question raised by the point above, they must also answer it logically. That is, they must present a clear inductive or deductive argument, one or the other, but not both at once. These are the only two types of logical relationship possible in a grouping.

 

A deductive grouping presents an argument in successive steps. That is, the first idea makes a statement about a situation that exists in the world today. The second idea comments on the subject or the predicate of that statement, and the third idea states the implication of those two situations existing in the world at the same time. Thus, the grouping would have the following form:

- Men are mortal.

- Socrates is a man.

- Therefore Socrates is mortal.

 

To move up a level of abstraction front a deductive grouping, you summarize the argument, with your summary resting heavily on the final point: "Because Socrates is a man he is mortal."

 

An inductive grouping, by contrast, will take a set of ideas that are related simply by virtue of the fact that you can describe them all by the same plural noun (reasons for, reasons against, steps, problems, etc.). The form of this argument would be:

French tanks are at the Polish border.

German tanks are at the Polish border.

Russian tanks are at the Polish border:

 

To move upward here, you draw an inference based on your assessment of what is the same about the points-i.e., they are all warlike movements against Poland. Thus, your inference would be something like "Poland is about to be invaded by tanks."

 

If you choose to answer the question raised by an idea deductively, you know you must have an argument in which the second point comments on the subject or predicate of the first, and the third point draws a "therefore" from the previous two. If you choose to answer inductively, you know the ideas in the grouping must be logically alike and can be designated by a plural noun.

 

Given this knowledge, you could start to build your pyramid anywhere, with a single idea, adding the other ideas as they are demanded-either up or down or sideways. But there is one more thing you need to know before you venture off to build a pyramid of your own. And that is the beginning question to which your document must give the answer. You determine that by tracing the narrative flow of the introduction.