Schemas and instances

A defining property of the cognitive model is that the characterisation of linguistic units as symbolic units is not restricted to the content system but also applies to the grammatical system. In other words, grammatical units are also seen as form-meaning pairings. As we have seen, while the meaning associated with open-class units is specific (rich in conceptual content), the meaning associated with closed-class units is schematic. From this perspective, there is no need to posit a sharp boundary in the grammar between open-class and closed class units. Instead, specificity versus schematicity of meaning can be viewed as the poles of a continuum, according to which both open-class and closed-class expressions are meaningful, each making a distinct and necessary contribution to the cognitive representation prompted by the utterance. According to Langacker, the inventory of symbolic units is organised by schema-instance relations. A schema is a symbolic unit that emerges from a process of abstraction over more specific symbolic units called instances. In other words, schemas form in the mental grammar when patterns of similarity are abstracted from utterances, giving rise to a more schematic representation or symbolic unit. The relationship between a schema and the instances from which it emerges is the schema-instance relation. This relationship is hierarchical in nature.

Consider common nouns like cats, dogs, books, flowers and so on. Each of these expressions is a highly entrenched symbolic unit. For example, the symbolic unit cats might be represented by the formula in (43):

The representations in SMALL CAPITALS indicate the semantic poles and those in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) font represent the phonological poles. The slash indicates the symbolic link between semantic and phonological poles, and the hyphen indicates the linking of symbolic units to form a complex structure. Given that there are many cases of regular plural nouns in the linguistic inventory, this regular pattern is captured by a schematic symbolic unit which contains only schematic information about the construction. This schema for plural nouns is represented in (44).

In this schematic representation, the semantic pole THING indicates a noun but its corresponding phonological unit is left blank to indicate that this construction represents nouns in general. Each fully specified unit corresponding to this schema (for example, the expressions cats, dogs, books, flowers) represents an instance of the schema. The hierarchical relationship between a schema and its instances is captured in Figure 14.8.

It is important to point out here that the schema-instance relation is not restricted to symbolic units. For Langacker, the schema is any superordinate (more general) element in a taxonomy and the instance is any subordinate (more specific) element. In other words, the schema-instance relation represents a type of categorisation relation. In terms of phonological units, for example, the phoneme is the schema and its allophones are instances. In terms of semantic units, the concept FLOWER is schematic in relation to the instances ROSE, LILY and GERBERA. An instance is said to elaborate its schema, which means that it provides more specific meaning. For example, MAMMAL is more specific than ANIMAL, and in turn MONKEY is more specific than MAMMAL.

اخر الاخبار

اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يقيم مهرجان الماء المعين السنوي الثالث في بغداد

على هامش المؤتمر التمهيدي لألفية الحوزة العلمية.. الهيأة العليا تقيم جلسة حوارية عن تراث الشيخ الطوسي

العتبة العباسية المقدسة تستعد لإقامة حفل التكليف الشرعي لتلميذات مدارس كربلاء

لليوم الثاني.. قسم التطوير يواصل تقديم دورة إعداد المدربين (TOT) لملاكات مديرية تربية كربلاء

المزيد

الآخبار الصحية

اللوز.. "كنز صحي" يحمي دماغك

رفض اعتماد "لقاح موديرنا" للإنفلونزا.. وكشف الأسباب ؟

تحذير طبي من مرض شائع يزيد خطر الإصابة بنوعين من السرطان

الإنفلونزا لا تضرب الرئة فقط.. دراسة تكشف خطرها على القلب

المزيد

الآخبار التكنلوجية

سلاح طبي في ساحات الحرب.. رذاذ يوقف النزيف خلال ثانية !

مايكروسوفت تدق ناقوس الخطر وتحذر من "الذكاء الاصطناعي الخفي"

الإمارات تطلق شراكة عالمية مع ستارلينك لإتاحة التعليم الرقمي

"أوبن إيه آي" تختبر عرض الإعلانات داخل محادثات chatgpt

المزيد

مواضيع ذات صلة

Cognitive approaches to grammar summery

Sanctioning and grammaticality

Features of the closed-class subsystem

Grammatical knowledge: a structured inventory of symbolic units

Characteristics of the cognitive approach to grammar

Agreement and case

Grammatical functions

Word classes

Units of grammar

Grammar

Grammatical terminology

Cognitive approaches to grammaticalization