Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
INFERENCE
المؤلف:
John Field
المصدر:
Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P129
2025-08-31
36
INFERENCE
The process of adding information which is not linguistically present in a text. This is often because a speaker/writer has recognised that certain details and logical connections do not need to be specifically expressed because the recipient will co-operate in supplying them. Several types of inference have been identified:
Logical inference. If a speaker uses the word BACHELOR, it entails that the person referred to is male.
Bridging inference (also termed necessary, backward or integrative inference). To achieve a full understanding of:
a. Bill had been murdered. The knife lay by the body. it is necessary to infer that the body refers to Bill, that the knife was the weapon and that Bill was murdered by stabbing. Only in this way can the reader impose coherence upon the text. The need to make a bridging inference is often signalled by the introduction of a new entity marked for definiteness as if it were ‘given’. Thus, in a above, the article the marks out both body and knife as understood in relation to the text that has preceded them. In many cases, the ‘given’ may be a component of the meaning of an earlier word (perhaps a meronym).
b. He went into the room. The windows were open. (Given the word ROOM, the presence of windows is taken for granted.) Bridging inferences demand extra attentional capacity and therefore slow down processing. It takes longer to process the cola in context c than in d.
c. We checked the picnic supplies. The cola was warm.
d. We got some cola out of the trunk. The cola was warm.
Elaborative inference (also termed forward or predictive inference). The reader uses this type of inference to enrich an interpretation, but it is not essential to understanding and can readily be reversed if later information indicates it is incorrect. Cancellation does not cause disruption to the representation of the text that has been constructed. The distinction between necessary and elaborative inferences is not always a clear one.
Bridging inferences are stored as part of an ongoing mental representation. Listeners often fail to distinguish what they have inferred from what they have heard. Many subjects, presented with the sentence:
e. He slipped on a wet spot and dropped the delicate glass pitcher on the floor, later recalled being told that the pitcher broke. However, there is disagreement as to the extent to which bridging inferences are integrated. A constructivist view holds that all bridging inferences are added to propositional information from the text, whereas a minimalist view argues that only a minimal number is stored in this way.
Elaborative inferences differ from bridging ones in that they do not appear to form part of the mental representation. It has been suggested that, while bridging inferences are made on-line during text processing, elaborative inferences may not be made until later, during recall.
Some apparent elaborative inferences may represent no more than the effects of the automatic process of spreading activation, in which a recent encounter with a word speeds up the recognition of associated ones. The word SHOVEL turned out to be a good cue for recalling the sentence:
f. The grocer dug a hole with a pitchfork
because of its association with the verb DIG.
See also: Given/new, Mental model, Mental representation, Schema theory
Further reading: Brown and Yule (1983); Oakhill and Garnham (1988); Singer (1990, 1994)
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
