Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Problems and possible solutions
المؤلف:
Cathy S.P. Wong
المصدر:
Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment
الجزء والصفحة:
P13-C1
2025-05-24
22
Problems and possible solutions
One of the concerns shared by a number of staff members in using the SOLO taxonomy is the problem of reliability and consistency. There is some conceptual ambiguity inherent in SOLO's structure which "makes categorization unstable along with the problem of low inter-rater reliability" (Chan et al., 2002, p.512). In fact, when the SOLO taxonomy was first adopted by the English Department, staff members were already aware of this issue of inter-rater reliability. Attempts have been taken to tackle this problem. It has been agreed that parity meetings would be held among teachers periodically during the semester. The purpose of these meetings would be to discuss sample scripts of students' work so as to achieve a fair application of the criteria. Comments from colleagues about this procedural measure indicate that in addition to the parity meetings stipulated for individual subjects, such meetings should also be held at a departmental level because parity across subjects is also needed.
A related problem is the mapping of the criteria onto the specific assessment tasks of the different subjects. Some staff members felt that the criteria should be more refined or more elaborate in order to suit different subjects and different tasks. This is similar to the findings reported in Chan, Tsui, Chan and Hong (2002). They also criticize the assessment criteria of the SOLO taxonomy as being vague. However, if the SOLO taxonomy is meant to be applicable across a wide variety of disciplines, it is bound to be general and hence "vague". Lake (1999) has demonstrated how the structure of the complexity of understanding can be effectively transformed into a template to be applied to the teaching of interpreting graphs and tables in biological sciences. There is no reason why this cannot be accomplished for other subjects.
This problem can only be solved by candid sharing among staff members of their experience in adapting the taxonomy to their respective subjects and to specific assignment tasks. The accumulation of good practices and examples of the application of the SOLO taxonomy thus becomes crucial. This should be administered at the departmental level so as to build a resource base available for staff.