Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
The autonomy of CamE phonology and the concept of Trilateral Process
المؤلف:
Augustin Simo Bobda
المصدر:
A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
899-50
2024-05-17
1141
The autonomy of CamE phonology and the concept of Trilateral Process
The CamE accent, though still intelligible to mother tongue accents to a large extent, is markedly different from several points of views. In fact it has reached a very high degree of autonomy. This autonomy, as amply demonstrated and exemplified notably in Simo Bobda (1994), is seen in the restructuring of the sound system of mother tongue English. This restructuring results in the numerous and major splits and mergers of Wells’ (1982) lexical sets. Autonomy is also seen in the way CamE applies existing phonological rules and, above all, in the application of its own sui generis rules.
The concept of “Trilateral Process”, proposed by Simo Bobda (1994) and discussed further by Simo Bobda and Chumbow (1999), best illustrates the autonomy of Cameroon English. According to this concept, the underlying representations of mother tongue segments A are restructured to new CamE underlying representations B; while the underlying representations A undergo mother tongue English phonological rules to yield the surface representation AI, the CamE underlying representations B may undergo their own independent phonological rules or surface unchanged as BI. For example, RP s [Λ] cceed is restructured to CamE underlying representation s [ɔ] cceed. While RP s [Λ] cceed undergoes Vowel Reduction to become s[ə]cceed, the CamE underlying representation surfaces unchanged as s [ɔ] cceed. A second example is RP underlying representation veg[ε]tate, restructured to CamE underlying representation veg[ε]tate; while RP veg[ε]tate undergoes Vowel Reduction to surface as veg [ɪ] tate, the CamE underlying representation veg[ε]tate does not undergo Vowel Reduction; in contrast, it undergoes E-Tensing and surfaces as veg[e]tate.
One example with consonants is the occurrence of [ʃ] (for RP [Ʒ]) in words like conclu /ʃ/ ion, divi /ʃ/ ion, inva /ʃ/ ion, revi /ʃ/ ion, as seen above. Seen through the Trilateral Process, [ʃ] can be traced from an underlying /d/ or /z/ changing to /s/ through autonomous CamE rules, before becoming [ʃ] through the application of existing rules of English phonology.
Tracing thus the peculiarities of CamE phonology to their underlying representations seems more rewarding than previous analyses based solely on surface forms; indeed, in the above examples, surface analysis would have limited itself to showing that RP /ə/, /ɪ/ and /Ʒ/ are replaced in s[ə]cceed, veg /ɪ/ tate and conclu /Ʒ/ ion by [ɔ] , [e] and [ʃ], respectively.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
